Category Archives: Posts

Week 8 (10/13-10/18): How to Mislead People Using Scientific Genres

Welcome to Week 8! After this week, we will officially be halfway done with the semester. Yay! This week is also the first week of Unit 3, in which we will be studying writing in/about the natural sciences. For an overview of the entire unit, click here.

We will not have Optional Zoom Class on Monday (10/12), because it is a holiday. Instead, optional Zoom class will be Wednesday, 10/14 at 10:50am. CUNY has designated this Wednesday as a “CUNY Monday,” where we are supposed to follow the Monday class schedule.

Please also fill out the peer review survey, to prepare for next week.

General Content Warning

This week, the readings are going to mostly be about the coronavirus. Generally, I take the position that class shouldn’t force you to spend more time thinking about super stressful/traumatic topics, that class should give you an opportunity for escape. However, it seems ridiculous to talk about science writing without talking about the virus, since virus news is the main kind of science writing most people have been reading or hearing about for months.

If you would prefer to avoid reading about the virus for class, please look at these instead:

Article 1 
TED Talk (with transcript if you prefer to read)

Due Dates

Annotations + Response Comments to the Podcast due Thursday, 10/15 (so you have several days to think about the main activity for the week)

Data Visualization Activity due Sunday, October 18

No late penalty for either one, I just recommend you do the reading/listening/annotations early in order to be prepared for the activity.

A Very Short History of Science Writing

Just as “humanities” is a broad term with blurry edges (for example, why is gender studies considered humanities and not social science?), “natural science” is also not a solid category, but is generally counterposed with social science. Physics and chemistry seem like definitely natural science, as does biology, but what about a psychologist or a neuroscientist? Are they natural science, since they deal with brains and do scientific experiments, or are they social science, since they deal with people? So, with academic disciplines and with writing genres, there are no hard and fast rules that are true 100% of the time.

However, disciplines within the category of “natural science” tend to have similar writing styles/expectations. There are a couple of reasons for this.

  1. Scientific writing in the English language essentially began in the 1660s— nearly 400 years ago– when The Royal Society formed in England. They were essentially a club for upper class English scientists to get together and talk about science/do experiments every week. The Royal Society started the first science journals written in English. All scholarly journals written in English since then are influenced by those early journals, so writing expectations are similar.
  2. “Science” didn’t use to be as split up by subject area as it is now. In fact, choosing a major in college wasn’t even a thing until the late 1800s. So, what we now know as separate areas of study (biology, physics, chemistry) didn’t used to be very separate at all– so of course their genres and writing expectations are similar. The most prestigious scientific journals of today also publish research from a variety of subject areas, so all of those researchers are writing for the same set of editorial expectations.
  3. Shared values– the goal of the scientific method is to discover objective, Definitely True knowledge, that other scientists can verify by repeating the experiment. That doesn’t always happen, but that’s the goal. So, scientific genres evolved over time that would help scientists communicate with each other with these goals in mind– very detailed but very direct writing, for example, and clearly-labeled subsections instead of paragraphs that all flow directly into one another (like in the humanities).

Goals for This Week

  • Learn to identify multiple genre conventions of scientific communication
  • Learn to analyze the rhetorical dimensions of how scientific information is presented
  • Apply the skills and knowledge above to evaluate the scientific communication you encounter in your daily life

Overview of Tasks

  1. Write your way into the week
  2. Listen to a podcast episode
  3. Read a fake scientific study and my annotations/commentary on that study
  4. View some examples of Bad/Misleading Graphs and Charts
  5. Annotate and/or comment on the materials in Steps 2-4
  6. Create your own scientific communication
  7. Fill out the Peer Review Survey

Detailed Instructions

Step 1: Write Your Way Into the Week

Here are your thinking questions for this week! Please spend 5-10 minutes freewriting about them (or ignoring them and freewriting more generally), which you can then share with me if you wish or keep to yourself. If you don’t want to write, please at least read the questions and think about them!

  1. If you see a scientific claim in the news or on social media, how do you determine whether or not it is true? What information or signs do you look for to indicate if it is trustworthy or not?
  2. When teachers say to use “scholarly sources” or “peer-reviewed sources,” what does that mean? Why is a scholarly or peer-reviewed source more trustworthy?

Step 2: Listen to a Podcast Episode

Click here to access the episode. You can also download it or stream on other podcast platforms if you prefer.

If you are not able to listen to a podcast episode, I will provide some links to articles covering similar information that you can read instead.

Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
Article 4

Step 3: Read/Skim a Fake Scientific Study and Read My Commentary On It

This study was posted online in the spring and forcibly removed almost immediately because it contains so much misinformation. However, it is archived and can still be read. It has been extensively debunked online. The commentary is the post I wrote about it for my students during the spring. I repeat: THE CONCLUSIONS OF THIS STUDY ARE FALSE.

Fake Study Link
My Commentary

Step 4: View Some Graphs and Charts

Bad/Misleading Virus-Related Charts

Chart about Zika virus displayed on NBC
Some Misleading Charts About Coronavirus

How Different Kinds of Election Maps Imply Different Things— all of these are based on truthful data, but how you choose to display the data says different things!
Different Ways of Mapping Election Results
“United States of Apathy” map
**I don’t think this actually shows voter apathy, I think it shows a combination of voter suppression/difficulty voting + people who thought neither Trump nor Clinton was going to help them, so why bother picking between them**

Step 5: Annotate/Comment

From what you read/listened to/looked at, please leave annotations on Hypothes.is OR a comment on this post that respond to the following questions:

  1. How did the materials for this week change you thinking about data and scientific communication? What did you learn?
  2. If you see a scientific claim in the news or on social media, either in words or as a visual, how do you determine whether or not it is true? What information or signs do you look for to indicate if it is trustworthy or not?

Step 6: Data Visualization Activity

  1. Find an existing data visualization, similar to the examples I provided above.
  2. Examine it closely, and analyze what information is communicated, and what information is hidden or left out. You may need to look at the fine print on data collection if you can find it. (For another coronavirus example, a low total confirmed case count doesn’t mean very much if very few people are able to get tested.)
  3. Write out your analysis (can just be bullet points, or paragraphs)
  4. Then either create or describe in writing another way to visualize the same data that communicates something else. If you want to make your own graph or chart, any spreadsheet program (like Google Sheets) will allow you to do that.

Grading

  1. Annotations/Podcast Commentary (Week 8) — 2 pts, completion
  2. Data Visualization Activity (Week 8) — 2 pts, completion

Unit 3 Overview (10/13-11/1): Natural Sciences Writing

Welcome to Unit 3! We’re halfway through the semester (in terms of our content, not quite in terms of time).

Science writing, in my view, has 2 major types: scholarly/academic/scientific reports, and writing designed to communicate scientific information/findings to the general public (which can range from news articles to TV documentaries to Sesame Street specials– like the one created to help explain the coronavirus to young children).

This unit will have the following structure:

  1. One week (Week 8) on Using Science to Mislead People (this will use writing examples from the natural sciences, but applies to all kinds of science writing)
  2. Two weeks (Weeks 9 and 10) studying and creating scientific articles in the style of the natural sciences
  3. One week (Week 11) finishing up the unit + taking a breather for reflection and the election

This will also be the first unit in which we participate in peer review. Please click here to fill out the peer review survey.

Writing For This Unit

This unit, you will be writing only one major creation— an imaginary (or not) scientific article. You will write at least two drafts of this article.

Grading/Checklist for This Unit

The Natural Sciences rubric is worth 20% of your overall grade (this is 5% more than Units 1 and 2). It will be graded out of 30 points. 

The Election Day activity is extra credit that you can apply to either Unit 3 (because we’re in that unit) or Unit 1 (since it will be about the news)– your choice.

  1. Annotations/Podcast Commentary (Week 8) — 2 pts, completion
  2. Data Visualization Activity (Week 8) — 2 pts, completion
  3. First Draft (Week 9) — 2 pts, completion
  4. Peer Review Comments For Your Partner (Week 9) — 5 pts, see rubric
  5. Revised Draft (Week 10) — 10 pts, see rubric
  6. Unit Reflection (Week 11) — 5 pts, see rubric
  7. Check-In Activity (Week 11) — 2 pts, completion
  8. Attending QuickStart Workshop 3 (Your Choice of Day/Time)– 2 pts, completion
  9. Election Activity (Week 11) — 2 pts, completion. Choose whether you want points from this to go to Unit 3 or Unit 1. 

Total: 30 points = 100% for the unit
100% for the unit = 20% of your final grade.
**I will input all the math into Blackboard so you don’t have to worry about calculating what this means for you**

Criticism notes

  1. Both men were grabbing the audiences attention with scenes from movies, and their dialogue. I was shocked at the first video because I haven’t seen Little Woman but the guy talked about it so well that I understood exactly what it was about and how Greta developed her own idea on it. With the second video I was also shocked at the curse word being used so much, but this only helped his point by proving how shocked we were to hear it so much.
  2. The writers took the pieces that benefited their point of view. The first video shows how the scenes were from different timelines and it was simple to differentiate them. The second video pulled videos where the F word was used in multiple scenes to show how many times it’s been used and so casually.

Review on Charmed

The show Charmed is a fun, wholesome show about the journey between three sisters who are united after their mothers tragic death. When the sisters are brought together they are faced with a mind blowing turn in their lives. They realize they are part of the supernatural world and take after their mother. When they came to this realization they decided to stick together and pursue their new lives as supernatural beings. Throughout the show the three sisters have developed a very strong bond. With each battle the bond gets stronger and they become very close. This creates a great sense of family and loyalty because no matter what happens they stick together and help each other face the supernatural beings that cross their paths.

Week 7 (10/5-10/12): Academic Humanities Criticism

This week, we’ll be looking at how academic writing in the humanities is similar to and different from humanities writing in non-academic genres (our focus for Week 6). This is the last week in our humanities unit.

We will have Optional Zoom Class on Monday (10/5) at 10:50am.

Due Dates

Annotations on an academic article: End of Friday, October 9.

Academic version of Week 6 analysis: End of Monday, October 12.

Unit Reflection: End of Tuesday, October 13.

Goals for This Week

  • Compare academic writing about the humanities to the non-academic genres we studied last week
  • Apply the genre of academic writing to your analysis from last week
  • Reflect on what you’ve learned about humanities criticism

Overview of Tasks

  1. Write your way into the week
  2. Read examples of academic humanities criticism
  3. Choose 1 example to closely annotate with your observations
  4. Convert your analysis from last week into academic-style paragraphs
  5. Reflect on this unit and write about it

Detailed Instructions

Step 1: Write Your Way Into the Week

Here are your thinking questions for this week! Please spend 5-10 minutes freewriting about them (or ignoring them and freewriting more generally), which you can then share with me if you wish or keep to yourself. If you don’t want to write, please at least read the questions and think about them!

  1. In your experience, how should each body paragraph of an academic essay be structured? In other words, what does each body paragraph need to include, and what order should those things come in?
  2. In your experience, how is academic writing stylistically different from the genres we studied last week? What is normal in academic writing that is not normal in non-academic genres, and what is normal in non-academic genres that would be weird/inappropriate in academic writing?

Steps 2 and 3: Read Examples of Academic Humanities Criticism and Annotate One

Since early 2018, I’ve been working on converting my thoughts about Shrek into an academic essay. It’s not finished yet (and I haven’t made progress in quite some time), but I would like you to read a couple paragraphs of what I have so far. I have left my own annotations on the paragraphs to talk through my writing choices with you.

Click here to view the PDF of my comments. Or here if you need a .docx file.

Then, please skim all of the following articles to get a sense of the content and structure and then choose one (or more) to closely read and annotate using Hypothes.is.

The first article is by a graduate student studying psychology, the second is by a graduate student studying anthropology, and the third is by an undergraduate student studying film and new media. Even though psychology and anthropology are considered social science instead of humanities, people from all majors can do humanities criticism!

  1. “A Case Study of of Transgender Representation in Video Games: Mass Effect’s Hainly Abrams”
  2. “Making Sense of Memes: Where They Come From and Why We Keep Clicking Them” (there are two pages, so when you reach the end of the first page make sure to click through)
  3. “The Feminine Threat: Reconsidering the Damsel in Distress in Early Disney Films”

Another thing I want you to notice is how the titles of most academic essays are structured. They very often follow this pattern: “Short Fun Phrase: Longer More Descriptive Phrase”

In your annotations, in addition to commenting with any comments/questions you have, please pay attention to the style and structure of the articles and note your observations, along the lines of my own annotations on my paragraphs.

Step 4: Write Your Own Academic Paragraphs

I am NOT asking you to write a full essay (although you can if you want to).

Instead, I want you to write 3 or more paragraphs that adapt some aspects of your analysis from last week into academic writing, using the appropriate level of analysis and detail. Pretend that these paragraphs will belong to a much longer essay.

For example, in my Twitter thread, only one of my tweets was about the Robin Hood scene in Shrek, but that one tweet became nearly 2 pages of academic writing.

If you want to get some practice writing introductions and conclusions, one of your paragraphs can be an intro or a conclusion to your imagined full essay, but at least two of your paragraphs should be body paragraphs. (See below for how I will grade this)

Step 5: Write Your Unit Reflection

Here are the instructions for your Unit 2 Reflections.

Grading

  1. Annotations on an Academic Article  — 2 pts, completion
  2. Academic Paragraphs Version of Analysis (Week 7)  — 7 pts, see below
  3. Unit Reflection — 5 pts, see link above for rubric

Unit 2 Reflection Instructions

At the end of each unit, I will ask you to submit a reflection on your/our work for that unit. The instructions/rubric for each one will be very similar.

The Due Date for Unit 2 Reflections is October 13 (Tuesday) at 11:59pm. You are welcome to submit them on Blackboard OR post them on the course site, if you would like to share your reflections with the class. There will be no penalty for turning this in late.

In your reflection, please answer the following questions:

  1. What do you feel like you learned this unit that you didn’t know before?
  2. What did you already know , but now understand better or learned more about?
  3. What (if anything) do you feel like I wanted you to learn, but you still aren’t sure about?
  4. What are the strengths of your final project articles? What are you most proud of?
  5. If you were to revise your final project articles, what would you want to do differently?
  6. How would you describe or rate your participation/engagement in this unit?
  7. What did you do this unit that helped make you successful?
  8. What (if anything) do you want to do differently in the next unit?
  9. What additional things (resources, support, information, etc.) do you wish you had had for this unit?
  10. Is there anything you would like me to change (in the structure of our course, in how I’m presenting information, etc.) going forward?
  11. For you, how did this unit compare to the News Unit?
  12. What (if anything) from this unit would you like to discuss/think about/explore further? (either this semester or just in your life)

You can write this as an essay, or you can copy/paste the questions and answer each one individually. You can be as formal or as informal as you want.

Length Requirement: There is no set length (in pages or word count) for this reflection. Your reflection should be as long as it needs to be for you to feel like you have answered all of the questions.

Grading:

The unit reflection will be graded out of 5 points.

0 points: You didn’t turn in a reflection.
1 point: 
You turn in something that does reflect on the unit at least a little
2 points: 
You address at least half of the questions in your reflection
3 points: You address most of the questions in your reflection
4 points: You answer all of the questions in your reflection
5 points: You answer all of the questions using specific examples

Week 5 (9/21-9/28): Writing Reviews/Criticism

This week, the first week in our unit on Humanities Criticism, we will be studying how to write reviews. Reviews are also another subgenre of News Writing, in which a critic provides a description of a piece of work (a book, a movie, a TV show, a music video, etc.) and then analyzes its qualities, content, and shortcomings.

Because we are writing about cultural/artistic items, it will be more difficult to do the “imaginary writing” element of the class this unit. However, if there’s a “book within a book” or “musical within a movie” you like, you could write an imaginary review of that. For example, if you watch Pose, you could write a review of one house’s performance at one of the balls, rather than reviewing the TV show itself. If you like Harry Potter, you could write a review of one of Gilderoy Lockhart’s books and pretend you are publishing it in the Daily Prophet.

Optional Zoom Class: Monday, 9/21, 10:50am. We will check in with each other, discuss anything you want to talk about that’s come up in previous weeks, I will run through reminders/things that your work has made me think about, and then we’ll go over the activities + assignments for this coming week.

Due Dates

All assignments for this unit will be due by the end of the day on Monday, September 28. While we normally have things due on Sundays, CUNY is closed on Monday for Yom Kippur, so you get an extra day.

There will be no penalty for late work for anything in this unit.

Goals for This Week

  • Analyze the genre of reviews/criticism to learn how they are structured and styled
  • Reflect on the role of first drafts in “the” writing process more generally and your writing process specifically
  • Evaluate a piece of media and write your own review/criticism of that work

Overview of Tasks

  1. Write your way into the week.
  2. Read the chapter about how to write reviews.
  3. Read or Skim some different examples of reviews. Annotate as you go if you find it useful.
  4. Post a comment to my discussion prompt based on what you read.
  5. Read the article “Shitty First Drafts” before you begin your writing process. Annotate as you go if you find it useful.
  6. Write a review/criticism of a piece of media of your choosing.

Detailed Instructions

Step 1: Write Your Way Into the Week

Here are your thinking questions for this week! Please spend 5-15 minutes freewriting about them (or ignoring them and freewriting more generally), which you can then share with me if you wish or keep to yourself. If you don’t want to write, please at least read the questions and think about them!

1. If you are trying to research a movie (or book, or TV show, etc.) ahead of time to decide if you will like it or not, what information do you want to know about it?

2. If you watched a movie (or read a book, etc.) and want to know what other people thought about it, what kinds of things do you hope they will talk about in their review (so you can see if you agree or disagree)?

3. How does the place where the author is publishing the review affect what you’re expecting from it and how they should go about writing it? (For example, an Amazon review, a review in a newspaper or magazine, a review on social media, etc.)

Step 2: Read About How to Write Reviews

This chapter is from a book called On Writing Well. Zinsser (the author) draws a distinction between “reviews” and “criticism,” and he explains how they are similar and how they are different. I think there can be some overlap between the two.

Click here for the PDF. I don’t think Hypothes.is will work on this file, since my free trial of the software I used to convert the other PDFs to a Hypothes.is-readable format is now expired.

Step 3: Read or Skim Some Examples of Reviews

1. A review of a book called Fattily Ever After — while we do see the journalist’s opinion of the book this is more summary/description than criticism
2. This review is a joint review of two different books on the same theme.
3. “I Regret to Inform You That I’m Team Jacob Now” — a piece of criticism in which the author re-reads the Twilight series and discusses how her opinion has changed
4. “Son of the Black Panther” — a more complex piece of criticism on the Black Panther comics written by John Jay English professor Jonathan Gray.

These are all reviews of books, but feel free to also look up reviews of music, movies, or something else, if that interests you more. In either case, try to look at several different examples.

You can leave annotations using Hypothes.is on these reviews if you want to/would find that helpful, but I am not requiring annotations as a graded activity this week.

Step 4: Post a Comment in Response to the Discussion Prompt

Please respond to both of these questions.

  1. Based on the reviews and examples of criticism above, what do you think are the “rules” for writing a good review/piece of criticism? What do these articles have in common? Either in terms of content, structure/order of ideas, or writing style.
  2. Write a generic outline for writing a review and/or piece of criticism. (Please make it more specific than “intro body conclusion,” since that applies to most kinds of writing.) Try to write your outline so that someone not in our class could look at your outline and use it to write a review/piece of criticism of their own.

Step 5: Read “Shitty First Drafts”

Just about every single thing you’ve ever read is not a first draft. If you write a first draft and feel frustrated/bad about yourself because you feel like it isn’t very good, that does not mean you’re a bad writer.

Nonetheless, I know it can be stressful to share your writing with others– both teachers and peers. So, before you begin writing your review this week, please read this article on the magic of shitty first drafts and give yourself permission to write badly.

Click here for the PDF. It’s only 2.5 pages!

You can leave annotations using Hypothes.is on these reviews if you want to/would find that helpful, but I am not requiring annotations as a graded activity this week.

Step 6: Write a Review or Piece of Criticism of a Piece of Media

Writing a review will be easier/faster, but writing a piece of criticism will better prepare you for the rest of this unit. It’s up to you which one you choose.

Full instructions/rubric here.

Your reviews are due by the end of the day on Monday, September 28. You can post them here on the course site or upload them to Blackboard.